
Core i7-7700

Processor U300
Core i7-7700 vs Processor U300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-7700 vs Processor U300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-7700 vs Processor U300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-7700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Processor U300 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Processor U300.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,642 vs 8,897).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.8 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Processor U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅+3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.1 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-7700.
Quick Answers
So, is Processor U300 better than Core i7-7700?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7700 vs Processor U300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7700
The Core i7-7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,642 points. Launch price was $303.

Processor U300
The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7700 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor U300 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the Processor U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-7700 versus 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Processor U300 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i7-7700 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor U300 uses Raptor Lake-U (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700 scores 8,642 against the Processor U300's 8,897 — a 2.9% lead for the Processor U300. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 5 / 6+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+200% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+20380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| PassMark | 8,642 | 8,897+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,435 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor U300 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-7700) / not specified (Processor U300). The Core i7-7700 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Processor U300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-7700 rivals Ryzen 5 1600.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-7700 was priced at $272, while the Processor U300 came in at $193. On launch pricing ($272 vs $193), Processor U300 was $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7700 delivers 31.8 pts/$ vs 46.1 pts/$ for the Processor U300 — making the Processor U300 the 36.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $272 | $193-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.8 | 46.1+45% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














