Core i7-7700 vs Processor U300

Intel

Core i7-7700

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Processor U300

5 Cores6 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-7700 vs Processor U300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7700 vs Processor U300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7700 vs Processor U300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7700

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Processor U300 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Processor U300.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (8,642 vs 8,897).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.8 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Processor U300

2023

Why buy it

  • +3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $79 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
  • Delivers 45.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.1 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-7700.

Quick Answers

So, is Processor U300 better than Core i7-7700?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-7700 is ahead with a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Processor U300 pulls ahead with 3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor U300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 6 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Processor U300 is the better buy right now. Processor U300 comes in $79 cheaper on MSRP at $193 MSRP versus $272 MSRP, and it still gives you 3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-7700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 45.1% better value on MSRP (46.1 vs 31.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor U300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 6 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-7700 vs Processor U300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-7700

The Core i7-7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,642 points. Launch price was $303.

Intel

Processor U300

The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.

Processing Power

The Core i7-7700 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor U300 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the Processor U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-7700 versus 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Processor U300 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i7-7700 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor U300 uses Raptor Lake-U (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700 scores 8,642 against the Processor U300's 8,897 — a 2.9% lead for the Processor U300. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-7700Processor U300
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
5 / 6+25%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz+5%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+200%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+20380%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Raptor Lake-U (2023)
PassMark
8,642
8,897+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,435
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor U300 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-7700Processor U300
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-7700) / not specified (Processor U300). The Core i7-7700 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Processor U300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-7700 rivals Ryzen 5 1600.

FeatureCore i7-7700Processor U300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-7700 was priced at $272, while the Processor U300 came in at $193. On launch pricing ($272 vs $193), Processor U300 was $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7700 delivers 31.8 pts/$ vs 46.1 pts/$ for the Processor U300 — making the Processor U300 the 36.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-7700Processor U300
MSRP
$272
$193-29%
Performance per Dollar
31.8
46.1+45%
Release Date
2017
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.