
Core i7-7700

Xeon E5-4650
Core i7-7700 vs Xeon E5-4650 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-7700 vs Xeon E5-4650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-7700 vs Xeon E5-4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-7700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,344 less on MSRP ($272 MSRP vs $3,616 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1236.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.8 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $3,616 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-4650
2012Why buy it
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,599 vs 8,642).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($3,616 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-7700 better than Xeon E5-4650?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7700 vs Xeon E5-4650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7700
The Core i7-7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,642 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon E5-4650
The Xeon E5-4650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,599 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7700 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-7700 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 — a 24% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-7700 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700 scores 8,642 against the Xeon E5-4650's 8,599 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-7700. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4650.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+27% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 20480 kB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 8,642 | 8,599 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,435 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-7700) / not specified (Xeon E5-4650). The Core i7-7700 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-4650 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-7700 rivals Ryzen 5 1600.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-7700 was priced at $272, while the Xeon E5-4650 came in at $3616. On launch pricing ($272 vs $3616), Core i7-7700 was $3344 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7700 delivers 31.8 pts/$ vs 2.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4650 — making the Core i7-7700 the 172.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $272-92% | $3616 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.8+1225% | 2.4 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














