Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 3 7320U

CPU

GPU

Core i7-7700

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 3 7320U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2022

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 3 7320U Performance Spectrum

Core i7-7700

4 / 8

8,642

+0.2%

8,627

0.0%

FX-6350

Ryzen 3 3350U

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 3 7320U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 3 7320U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 3 7320U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,435 vs 4,907).
❌Launch MSRP is still $272 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 7320U

2022

Why buy it

✅+242% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-7700.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 7320U better than Core i7-7700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-7700 is ahead with a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 7320U pulls ahead with 242% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-7700 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 7320U is the stronger fit. You are getting 242% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 7320U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 3 7320U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $272 MSRP, and it still gives you 242% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-7700 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (31.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 7320U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FT6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 3 7320U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7700

The Core i7-7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,642 points. Launch price was $303.

Ryzen 3 7320U

The Ryzen 3 7320U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,627 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7700 and Ryzen 3 7320U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-7700 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320U — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-7700 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700 scores 8,642 against the Ryzen 3 7320U's 8,627 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-7700. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 1,435 vs 4,907 (109.5% advantage for the Ryzen 3 7320U). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7320U.

Feature	Core i7-7700	Ryzen 3 7320U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+2%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
PassMark	8,642	8,627
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,435	4,907+242%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,213
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,589

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses FT6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i7-7700 versus LPDDR5-5500 on the Ryzen 3 7320U — the Ryzen 3 7320U supports 129.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-7700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-7700) vs 4 (Ryzen 3 7320U) — the Core i7-7700 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 100-series,200-series (Core i7-7700) and FT6 (Ryzen 3 7320U).

Feature	Core i7-7700	Ryzen 3 7320U
Socket	LGA1151	FT6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	LPDDR5-5500+129%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-7700) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 7320U). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 630 (Core i7-7700) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 3 7320U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7700 targets Gaming, Ryzen 3 7320U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-7700 rivals Ryzen 5 1600; Ryzen 3 7320U rivals Core i3-1215U.