Processor U300 vs Ryzen 5 2400G

CPU

GPU

Processor U300

5 Cores6 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 2400G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Processor U300 vs Ryzen 5 2400G Performance Spectrum

Processor U300

5 / 6

8,897

+1.9%

8,734

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Processor U300 vs Ryzen 5 2400G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Processor U300 vs Ryzen 5 2400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Processor U300

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 51.7 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400G.

Ryzen 5 2400G

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon RX Vega 11, while Processor U300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,734 vs 8,897).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Processor U300 better than Ryzen 5 2400G?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 5 2400G is ahead with a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Processor U300 pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark. Processor U300 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor U300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Processor U300 is still the better call for a fresh build. Processor U300 comes in 14.2% more expensive on MSRP at $193 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 2400G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 8,734 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor U300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 6 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Processor U300 vs Ryzen 5 2400G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Processor U300

The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.

Ryzen 5 2400G

The Ryzen 5 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $169.

⚡

Processing Power

The Processor U300 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2400G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Processor U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400G — a 12% clock advantage for the Processor U300 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Processor U300 uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Processor U300 scores 8,897 against the Ryzen 5 2400G's 8,734 — a 1.8% lead for the Processor U300. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400G.

Feature	Processor U300	Ryzen 5 2400G
Cores / Threads	5 / 6+25%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+13%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+200%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-U (2023)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	8,897+2%	8,734
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	4,800
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,040
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,250

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor U300 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Processor U300	Ryzen 5 2400G
Socket	FCBGA1744	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Processor U300) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 2400G). The Ryzen 5 2400G includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 11), while the Processor U300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2400G targets Entry Gaming Desktop.

Feature	Processor U300	Ryzen 5 2400G
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon RX Vega 11
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Entry Gaming Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Processor U300 was priced at $193, while the Ryzen 5 2400G came in at $169. On launch pricing ($193 vs $169), Ryzen 5 2400G was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor U300 delivers 46.1 pts/$ vs 51.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 2400G — making the Ryzen 5 2400G the 11.4% better value option.

Feature	Processor U300	Ryzen 5 2400G
MSRP	$193	$169-12%
Performance per Dollar	46.1	51.7+12%
Release Date	2023	2018

Search Processor U300 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 2400G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.