
Processor U300

Xeon E5-4648 V3
Processor U300 vs Xeon E5-4648 V3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Processor U300 vs Xeon E5-4648 V3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Processor U300 vs Xeon E5-4648 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Processor U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4648 V3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,897 vs 9,061).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4648 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 53.6 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Xeon E5-4648 V3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.6 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-4648 V3 better than Processor U300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor U300 vs Xeon E5-4648 V3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Processor U300
The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.

Xeon E5-4648 V3
The Xeon E5-4648 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,061 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Processor U300 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4648 V3 has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4648 V3 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Processor U300 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Processor U300 uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Processor U300 scores 8,897 against the Xeon E5-4648 V3's 9,061 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon E5-4648 V3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4648 V3.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Xeon E5-4648 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6 | 12 / 24+140% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+100% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 1.7 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+275% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 8,897 | 9,061+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Processor U300 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Xeon E5-4648 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Processor U300 was priced at $193, while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 came in at $169. On launch pricing ($193 vs $169), Xeon E5-4648 V3 was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor U300 delivers 46.1 pts/$ vs 53.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4648 V3 — making the Xeon E5-4648 V3 the 15.1% better value option.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Xeon E5-4648 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193 | $169-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.1 | 53.6+16% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














