
Processor U300 vs Xeon E5-2670

Processor U300

Xeon E5-2670
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Processor U300 is positioned at rank 488 and the Xeon E5-2670 is on rank 974, so the Processor U300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Processor U300
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2670
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Processor U300 | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($60) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-U (2023) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Processor U300 | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+200%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Processor U300 and Xeon E5-2670

Processor U300
The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.

Xeon E5-2670
The Xeon E5-2670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,901 points. Launch price was $145.
Processing Power
The Processor U300 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E5-2670 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Processor U300 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Processor U300 uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Processor U300 scores 8,897 against the Xeon E5-2670's 8,901 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2670. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6 | 8 / 16+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+33% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz+117% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 20480 kB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 8,897 | 8,901 |
Memory & Platform
The Processor U300 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 384 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Processor U300) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2670). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2670 targets Server.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Processor U300 launched at $193 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2670 debuted at $1552. At current prices ($180 vs $60), the Xeon E5-2670 is $120 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor U300 delivers 49.4 pts/$ vs 148.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2670 — making the Xeon E5-2670 the 100% better value option.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193-88% | $1552 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $180 | $60-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.4 | 148.3+200% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











