
Processor U300

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Processor U300 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Processor U300 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Processor U300 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Processor U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,897 vs 9,056).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.8 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G better than Processor U300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor U300 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Processor U300
The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.


Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,056 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Processor U300 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Processor U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Processor U300 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Processor U300 uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Processor U300 scores 8,897 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 9,056 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300 vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6+25% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+5% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+208% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB+60% |
| Process | 10 nm-17% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 8,897 | 9,056+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Processor U300 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Processor U300 was priced at $193, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G came in at $149. On launch pricing ($193 vs $149), Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor U300 delivers 46.1 pts/$ vs 60.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G the 27.5% better value option.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193 | $149-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.1 | 60.8+32% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













