Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon E5-2637 v3

Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon E5-2637 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 2400GE

4 / 8

7,237

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2637 v3

4 / 8

7,248

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon E5-2637 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon E5-2637 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 2400GE

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $827 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
✅Delivers 488.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.8 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 11, while Xeon E5-2637 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2637 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,237 vs 7,248).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).

Xeon E5-2637 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 42.8 PassMark/$ ($996 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2637 v3 better than Ryzen 5 2400GE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2637 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 2400GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2637 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2637 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2637 v3 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-2637 v3 comes in 489.3% more expensive on MSRP at $996 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 2400GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,237 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 2400GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon E5-2637 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 2400GE

The Ryzen 5 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,237 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2637 v3

The Xeon E5-2637 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 7,248 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon E5-2637 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400GE versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v3 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2400GE (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2400GE scores 7,237 against the Xeon E5-2637 v3's 7,248 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2637 v3. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400GE vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2637 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2400GE	Xeon E5-2637 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	7,237	7,248
Geekbench 6 Single	826	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,847	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2400GE	Xeon E5-2637 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2400GE) / not specified (Xeon E5-2637 v3). The Ryzen 5 2400GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 11), while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2400GE	Xeon E5-2637 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 11	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 2400GE was priced at $169, while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 came in at $996. On launch pricing ($169 vs $996), Ryzen 5 2400GE was $827 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2400GE delivers 42.8 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2637 v3 — making the Ryzen 5 2400GE the 141.9% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2400GE	Xeon E5-2637 v3
MSRP	$169-83%	$996
Performance per Dollar	42.8+486%	7.3
Release Date	2018	2014

Search Ryzen 5 2400GE on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2637 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.