Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon Phi 7210

Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon Phi 7210 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 2400GE

4 / 8

7,237

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon Phi 7210

64 / 256

7,306

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon Phi 7210 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon Phi 7210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 2400GE

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,712 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,881 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1002.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.8 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,881 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 215W, a 180W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 11, while Xeon Phi 7210 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Phi 7210 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,237 vs 7,306).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7210, which brings 64 cores / 256 threads.

Xeon Phi 7210

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 256 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 42.8 PassMark/$ ($1,881 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌514.3% higher power demand at 215W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Phi 7210 better than Ryzen 5 2400GE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Phi 7210 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 2400GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Phi 7210 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Phi 7210 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 256 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Phi 7210 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon Phi 7210 comes in 1013.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,881 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 2400GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,237 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 2400GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon Phi 7210 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 2400GE

The Ryzen 5 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,237 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Phi 7210

The Xeon Phi 7210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 64 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 215 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,306 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 2400GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7210 offers 64 cores / 256 threads — the Xeon Phi 7210 has 60 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400GE versus 1.5 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7210 — a 86.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2400GE (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2400GE scores 7,237 against the Xeon Phi 7210's 7,306 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Phi 7210. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400GE vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7210.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2400GE	Xeon Phi 7210
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	64 / 256+1500%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+153%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+146%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	0 kB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)	Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark	7,237	7,306
Geekbench 6 Single	826	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,847	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2400GE	Xeon Phi 7210
Socket	AM4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2400GE) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7210). The Ryzen 5 2400GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 11), while the Xeon Phi 7210 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2400GE	Xeon Phi 7210
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 11	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 2400GE was priced at $169, while the Xeon Phi 7210 came in at $1881. On launch pricing ($169 vs $1881), Ryzen 5 2400GE was $1712 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2400GE delivers 42.8 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Phi 7210 — making the Ryzen 5 2400GE the 166.7% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2400GE	Xeon Phi 7210
MSRP	$169-91%	$1881
Performance per Dollar	42.8+997%	3.9
Release Date	2018	2016

Search Ryzen 5 2400GE on Amazon

Search Xeon Phi 7210 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.