Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is positioned at rank #236 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen Embedded V3C14 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($305) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Rembrandt (2022) / 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen Embedded V3C14 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+577%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($305) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 11,875 points. Launch price was $149.
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
The Ryzen Embedded V3C14 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,882 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 scores 11,875 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C14's 11,882 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V3C14. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C14.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen Embedded V3C14 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+39% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Rembrandt (2022) |
| PassMark | 11,875 | 11,882 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen Embedded V3C14 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 launched at $219 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 debuted at $305. At current prices ($45 vs $305), the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is $260 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 delivers 263.9 pts/$ vs 39.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 the 148.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen Embedded V3C14 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-28% | $305 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-85% | $305 |
| Performance per Dollar | 263.9+577% | 39.0 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen Embedded V3C14
