Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs Xeon E-2278GEL

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs Xeon E-2278GEL Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

6 / 12

11,875

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E-2278GEL

8 / 16

12,024

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs Xeon E-2278GEL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs Xeon E-2278GEL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,875 vs 12,024).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2278GEL, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Xeon E-2278GEL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Xeon E-2278GEL

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2278GEL better than Ryzen 5 PRO 1600?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2278GEL makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2278GEL is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2278GEL is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2278GEL is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2278GEL comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $219 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (54.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2278GEL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs Xeon E-2278GEL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 11,875 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E-2278GEL

The Xeon E-2278GEL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,024 points. Launch price was $519.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2278GEL offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E-2278GEL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E-2278GEL — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2278GEL (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2278GEL uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 scores 11,875 against the Xeon E-2278GEL's 12,024 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E-2278GEL. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 1600	Xeon E-2278GEL
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
PassMark	11,875	12,024+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2278GEL uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.