Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon D-1715TER

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon D-1715TER Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

4 / 8

9,056

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Xeon D-1715TER

4 / 8

9,104

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon D-1715TER FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon D-1715TER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,056 vs 9,104).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Xeon D-1715TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

Xeon D-1715TER

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1715TER better than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1715TER makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1715TER is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1715TER is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon D-1715TER comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 9,056 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1715TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), 150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon D-1715TER Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,056 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1715TER

The Xeon D-1715TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,104 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Xeon D-1715TER share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1715TER — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon D-1715TER uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G scores 9,056 against the Xeon D-1715TER's 9,104 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon D-1715TER. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1715TER.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G	Xeon D-1715TER
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+20%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+54%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	10 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	2 MB+60%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	12 nm	10 nm-17%
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	9,056	9,104

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1715TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.