Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5-4648 V3

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4648 V3

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2015

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5-4648 V3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5-4648 V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5-4648 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 13.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.8 vs 53.6 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (9,056 vs 9,061).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 30 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4648 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon E5-4648 V3

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.1% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…+650% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 4 MB).
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.6 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G better than Xeon E5-4648 V3?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4648 V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4648 V3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 650% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G comes in $20 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4648 V3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 13.4% better value on MSRP (60.8 vs 53.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5-4648 V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,056 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-4648 V3

The Xeon E5-4648 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,061 points. Launch price was $800.

⚑

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads β€” the Xeon E5-4648 V3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4648 V3 β€” a 62.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the Zen+ (2018βˆ’2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014βˆ’2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G scores 9,056 against the Xeon E5-4648 V3's 9,061 β€” a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-4648 V3. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4648 V3.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 3400GXeon E5-4648 V3
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+91%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+118%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
30 MB (total)+650%
L2 Cache
2 MB
256K (per core)+12700%
Process
12 nm-45%
22 nm
Architecture
Zen+ (2018βˆ’2019)
Haswell-EP (2014βˆ’2015)
PassMark
9,056
9,061
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 3400GXeon E5-4648 V3
Socket
AM4
LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was priced at $149, while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 came in at $169. On launch pricing ($149 vs $169), Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G delivers 60.8 pts/$ vs 53.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4648 V3 β€” making the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G the 12.5% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 3400GXeon E5-4648 V3
MSRP
$149-12%
$169
Performance per Dollar
60.8+13%
53.6
Release Date
2019
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.