
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E3-1270 v6

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

Xeon E3-1270 v6
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1270 v6
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G | Xeon E3-1270 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G | Xeon E3-1270 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Xeon E3-1270 v6

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,056 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1270 v6
The Xeon E3-1270 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 72 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,937 points. Launch price was $328.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Xeon E3-1270 v6 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1270 v6 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1270 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G scores 9,056 against the Xeon E3-1270 v6's 8,937 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1270 v6.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G | Xeon E3-1270 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 9,056+1% | 8,937 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1270 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G | Xeon E3-1270 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















