Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5-2670

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5-2670 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

4 / 8

9,056

+1.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Xeon E5-2670

8 / 16

8,901

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5-2670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5-2670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,403 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 959.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.8 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2670, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2670

2012

Why buy it

✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,901 vs 9,056).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G better than Xeon E5-2670?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2670 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G comes in $1,403 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $1,552 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 959.7% better value on MSRP (60.8 vs 5.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5-2670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,056 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2670

The Xeon E5-2670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,901 points. Launch price was $145.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2670 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 — a 24% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G scores 9,056 against the Xeon E5-2670's 8,901 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G	Xeon E5-2670
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+27%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+42%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	20480 kB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-63%	32 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	9,056+2%	8,901

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G	Xeon E5-2670
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	384 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2670). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2670 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G	Xeon E5-2670
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was priced at $149, while the Xeon E5-2670 came in at $1552. On launch pricing ($149 vs $1552), Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was $1403 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G delivers 60.8 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2670 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G the 165.5% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G	Xeon E5-2670
MSRP	$149-90%	$1552
Performance per Dollar	60.8+967%	5.7
Release Date	2019	2012

Search Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.