Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon D-1813NT

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon D-1813NT Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

4 / 8

7,677

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon D-1813NT

4 / 8

7,732

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon D-1813NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon D-1813NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 42W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,677 vs 7,732).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Xeon D-1813NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1813NT

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌20% higher power demand at 42W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE better than Xeon D-1813NT?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1813NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1813NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $149 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon D-1813NT is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1813NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), 150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon D-1813NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,677 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1813NT

The Xeon D-1813NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 42 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,732 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Xeon D-1813NT share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon D-1813NT — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is built on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE scores 7,677 against the Xeon D-1813NT's 7,732 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon D-1813NT. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs 10240 kB on the Xeon D-1813NT.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE	Xeon D-1813NT
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+67%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+50%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	10240 kB+150%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	12 nm	—
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	—
PassMark	7,677	7,732

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1813NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.