Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
VS
Xeon D-1813NT

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon D-1813NT

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon D-1813NT

4 Cores8 Thrd42 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-1813NT

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5376%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1015%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
902%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
697%
#266
EPYC 7C13
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
99%
#267
Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP: $3245|Avg: N/A
98%
#268
Xeon w5-2565X
MSRP: $1389|Avg: $1389
98%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
96%
#386
Xeon D-1813NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#388
Xeon E-2234
MSRP: $250|Avg: $136
100%
#399
Xeon D-1537
MSRP: $470|Avg: $350
96%
#401
Xeon E3-1505M v6
MSRP: $434|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon D-1813NT is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen 5 PRO 3400GEXeon D-1813NT
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($149)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 12 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / Standard Node)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE ($149), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($149 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen 5 PRO 3400GEXeon D-1813NT
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($149)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Xeon D-1813NT

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,677 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon D-1813NT

The Xeon D-1813NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 42 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,732 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Xeon D-1813NT share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon D-1813NT — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is built on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE scores 7,677 against the Xeon D-1813NT's 7,732 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon D-1813NT. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs 10240 kB on the Xeon D-1813NT.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 3400GEXeon D-1813NT
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz+67%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+50%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
10240 kB+150%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
12 nm
Architecture
Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark
7,677
7,732
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1813NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 3400GEXeon D-1813NT
Socket
AM4
FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%