
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

Xeon E3-1270L v4
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E3-1270L v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E3-1270L v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E3-1270L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $432 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
- β Delivers 290.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1270L v4, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E3-1270L v4
2015Why buy it
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (7,662 vs 7,677).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($581 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- β28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE better than Xeon E3-1270L v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E3-1270L v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019β2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,677 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1270L v4
The Xeon E3-1270L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,662 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Xeon E3-1270L v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1270L v4 β a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses the Picasso (2019β2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1270L v4 uses Broadwell-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE scores 7,677 against the Xeon E3-1270L v4's 7,662 β a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1270L v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+11% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+10% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019β2022) | Broadwell-DT (2015) |
| PassMark | 7,677 | 7,662 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,289 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 4,271 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1270L v4 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1270L v4). Primary use case: Xeon E3-1270L v4 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1270L v4 rivals Core i7-4790T.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | β | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE was priced at $149, while the Xeon E3-1270L v4 came in at $581. On launch pricing ($149 vs $581), Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE was $432 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1270L v4 β making the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE the 118.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-74% | $581 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.5+290% | 13.2 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













