Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E5-2620 v3

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

4 / 8

7,677

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2620 v3

6 / 12

7,734

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E5-2620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $268 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅Delivers 177.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 18.5 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,677 vs 7,734).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2620 v3, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.5 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE better than Xeon E5-2620 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2620 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2620 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE comes in $268 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $417 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2620 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 177.8% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 18.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,677 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,734 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE scores 7,677 against the Xeon E5-2620 v3's 7,734 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2620 v3. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+25%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+38%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	7,677	7,734

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2620 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2620 v3 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE was priced at $149, while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 came in at $417. On launch pricing ($149 vs $417), Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE was $268 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 18.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE the 94.1% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE	Xeon E5-2620 v3
MSRP	$149-64%	$417
Performance per Dollar	51.5+178%	18.5
Release Date	2019	2014

Search Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2620 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.