Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E3-1285 v4

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

4 / 8

7,677

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1285 v4

4 / 8

7,735

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E3-1285 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $407 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
✅Delivers 270.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,677 vs 7,735).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Xeon E3-1285 v4

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($556 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE better than Xeon E3-1285 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1285 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1285 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE comes in $407 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $556 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1285 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 270.4% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 13.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,677 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1285 v4

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,735 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses Broadwell-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE scores 7,677 against the Xeon E3-1285 v4's 7,735 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E3-1285 v4. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE	Xeon E3-1285 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+5%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Broadwell-DT (2015)
PassMark	7,677	7,735

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE	Xeon E3-1285 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE was priced at $149, while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 came in at $556. On launch pricing ($149 vs $556), Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE was $407 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE the 115% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE	Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP	$149-73%	$556
Performance per Dollar	51.5+271%	13.9
Release Date	2019	2015

Search Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1285 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.