
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

Xeon E5-2650L v2
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E5-2650L v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E5-2650L v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E5-2650L v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $3,966 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2685.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 1.8 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 70W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650L v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650L v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon E5-2650L v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+525% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,612 vs 7,677).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 70W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE better than Xeon E5-2650L v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs Xeon E5-2650L v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,677 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2650L v2
The Xeon E5-2650L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,612 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE versus 2.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L v2 — a 62.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE scores 7,677 against the Xeon E5-2650L v2's 7,612 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+90% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+94% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+525% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-45% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 7,677 | 7,612 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE was priced at $149, while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 came in at $4115. On launch pricing ($149 vs $4115), Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE was $3966 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 1.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2650L v2 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE the 186.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-96% | $4115 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.5+2761% | 1.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













