Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Xeon W-1290P

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Xeon W-1290P Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

6 / 12

22,132

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1290P

10 / 20

22,373

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Xeon W-1290P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Xeon W-1290P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 125W, a 119W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1290P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,132 vs 22,373).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290P, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon W-1290P

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌1983.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1290P better than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1290P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-1290P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1290P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1290P still makes the most sense overall. Xeon W-1290P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FP7/FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Xeon W-1290P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,132 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1290P

The Xeon W-1290P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,373 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-1290P offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1290P — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290P (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-1290P uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS scores 22,132 against the Xeon W-1290P's 22,373 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon W-1290P. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290P.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	Xeon W-1290P
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.2 GHz+4%
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+16%	3.7 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	20 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	6 MB	256K (per core)+4167%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	22,132	22,373+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1290P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.