Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Ryzen 7 260

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 5 GHz2023
Ryzen family
·······
Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 260
8 / 16
28,339
0.0%
brand logoRyzen Embedded V2718
brand logoRyzen 5 6600HS
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 1950
brand logoRyzen 7 8840HS
brand logoRyzen 9 7845HX
brand logoRyzen 9 9955HX3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
8 / 16
34,293
+21.0%
brand logoRyzen 7 7445HS
brand logoRyzen 7 6800H
brand logoRyzen 5 7500F
brand logoRyzen 9 8945H
brand logoRyzen 9 7900X3D
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low265 FPS
medium240 FPS
high202 FPS
ultra174 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
low266 FPS
medium247 FPS
high211 FPS
ultra186 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low486 FPS
medium399 FPS
high341 FPS
ultra304 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
low857 FPS
medium735 FPS
high579 FPS
ultra491 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low708 FPS
medium708 FPS
high708 FPS
ultra623 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
low857 FPS
medium857 FPS
high857 FPS
ultra857 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low708 FPS
medium708 FPS
high708 FPS
ultra708 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
low857 FPS
medium857 FPS
high857 FPS
ultra782 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra286 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low316 FPS
medium238 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra183 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
low358 FPS
medium275 FPS
high254 FPS
ultra220 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low290 FPS
medium252 FPS
high192 FPS
ultra151 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
low343 FPS
medium287 FPS
high216 FPS
ultra173 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low316 FPS
medium261 FPS
high219 FPS
ultra191 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
low380 FPS
medium346 FPS
high302 FPS
ultra259 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low240 FPS
medium221 FPS
high184 FPS
ultra171 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
low264 FPS
medium247 FPS
high209 FPS
ultra194 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 260

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 86.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 142.4 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (28,339 vs 34,293).

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 76.4 vs 142.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Ryzen 7 260?
Yes. Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.3% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data, 21% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.3% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 96 MB versus 16 MB.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the stronger fit. You are getting 21% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Ryzen 7 7800X3D comes in 125.6% more expensive on MSRP at $449 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.3% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 260 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 12.3% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 7800X3D makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 96 MB L3 cache instead of 16 MB and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,339 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 260 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 260 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 260 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 260 scores 28,339 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 19% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 260 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+2%
5 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz+16%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
96 MB (total)+500%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-20%
5 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark
28,339
34,293+21%
Cinebench R23 Multi
—
18,500
Geekbench 6 Single
—
2,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
—
15,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 260 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 260 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the Ryzen 7 260 supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 260) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Socket
FP8
AM5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+8%
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
128 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
28+40%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 260) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 260 targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 260 was priced at $199, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($199 vs $449), Ryzen 7 260 was $250 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 260 delivers 142.4 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 260 the 60.4% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 7800X3D
MSRP
$199-56%
$449
Performance per Dollar
142.4+86%
76.4
Release Date
2025
2023
Search Ryzen 7 260 on AmazonSearch Ryzen 7 7800X3D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.