Ryzen 7 260 vs Xeon D-2795NT
Ryzen 7 260
Xeon D-2795NT
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 260
Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-2795NT
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 260 | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($70) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 260 | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($70) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 260 and Xeon D-2795NT
Ryzen 7 260
The Ryzen 7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,339 points. Launch price was $299.
Xeon D-2795NT
The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 260 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2795NT offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 260 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT — a 48.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 260 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 260 is built on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 260 scores 28,339 against the Xeon D-2795NT's 28,463 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon D-2795NT. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 260 vs 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 260 | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+65% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 30 MB+88% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 28,339 | 28,463 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 260 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2795NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 260 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT — the Ryzen 7 260 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 260) vs 4 (Xeon D-2795NT). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 260) vs 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) — the Xeon D-2795NT offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 260 | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 1024 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 32+60% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 260) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT). The Ryzen 7 260 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon D-2795NT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 260 targets Mobile, Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 260 | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Mobile | Networking / Edge Computing / SoC |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 260 and Xeon D-2795NT
