Ryzen 7 260
VS
Ryzen 7 8845HS

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 8845HS

AMD

Ryzen 7 260

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 8845HS

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 260

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
100%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
94%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
92%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
88%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Ryzen 7 8845HS shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 8845HS
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 8845HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 260 and Ryzen 7 8845HS

AMD

Ryzen 7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,339 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,470 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 260 and Ryzen 7 8845HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 260 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8845HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 260 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8845HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 260 scores 28,339 against the Ryzen 7 8845HS's 28,470 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8845HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 8845HS
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark
28,339
28,470
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,500
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FP8 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 8845HS
Socket
FP8
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
LPDDR5x-7500
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
256 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 260) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 8845HS). Both include integrated graphics Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 260) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 260 targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 8845HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 8845HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V (SVM)
Target Use
Mobile
Gaming