Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS

AMD

Ryzen 7 260

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 7840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023
Ryzen family
·······

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 260

2025

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (28,339 vs 28,538).
    • Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

    Ryzen 7 7840HS

    2023

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Ryzen 7 260?
    Yes. Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 7 7840HS is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Ryzen 7 7840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 260 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 5.6% in the shared gaming data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 7 260 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

    Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Ryzen 7 260

    The Ryzen 7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,339 points. Launch price was $299.

    AMD

    Ryzen 7 7840HS

    The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

    Processing Power

    Both the Ryzen 7 260 and Ryzen 7 7840HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 260 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 260 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 260 scores 28,339 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 7840HS
    Cores / Threads
    8 / 16
    8 / 16
    Boost Clock
    5.1 GHz
    5.1 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.8 GHz
    3.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    16 MB (total)
    16 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    4 nm
    4 nm
    Architecture
    Hawk Point (2024−2025)
    Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
    PassMark
    28,339
    28,538
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    16,854
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,962
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    11,898
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the FP8 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 260 versus LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 33.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.

    FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 7840HS
    Socket
    FP8
    FP8
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-5600
    LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+34%
    Max RAM Capacity
    64 GB
    256 GB+300%
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 260) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS). Both include integrated graphics Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 260) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 260 targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

    FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 7840HS
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon 780M
    Radeon 780M
    Unlocked
    No
    Yes
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Yes
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    AMD-V, SVM
    Target Use
    Mobile
    High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC