Ryzen 7 2700E vs Core i9-10900T
Ryzen 7 2700E
Core i9-10900T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 2700E
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 2700E | Core i9-10900T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($329) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 2700E | Core i9-10900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+6511%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($329) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i9-10900T
Ryzen 7 2700E
The Ryzen 7 2700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,657 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i9-10900T
The Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,727 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 2700E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-10900T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-10900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700E versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i9-10900T — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900T (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700E is built on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700E scores 14,657 against the Core i9-10900T's 14,727 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-10900T. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700E vs 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i9-10900T.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Core i9-10900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+47% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache+25% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 14,657 | 14,727 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,710 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,476 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 2700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-10900T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Core i9-10900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 2700E) / Yes (Core i9-10900T). The Core i9-10900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 2700E requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Core i9-10900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 2700E launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900T debuted at $120. At current prices ($329 vs $5), the Core i9-10900T is $324 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 2700E delivers 44.6 pts/$ vs 2945.4 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900T — making the Core i9-10900T the 194% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Core i9-10900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $120-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $329 | $5-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.6 | 2945.4+6504% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i9-10900T
