Ryzen 7 3700U
VS
Xeon W3680

Ryzen 7 3700U vs Xeon W3680

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon W3680

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3680

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17567%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3317%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2947%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2277%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
100%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
99%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
99%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
97%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
96%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
96%
#817
Xeon W3680
MSRP: $594|Avg: $26
100%
#819
Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP: $939|Avg: $189
99%
#824
Xeon E5-1660 v3
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $198
98%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 7 3700U (2019) utilizes 12 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 7 3700UXeon W3680
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($26)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) / 12 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Gulftown (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon W3680 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 7 3700UXeon W3680
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($26)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon W3680

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700U

The Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,049 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon W3680

The Xeon W3680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $350.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W3680 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700U versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3680 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700U uses the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W3680 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700U scores 7,049 against the Xeon W3680's 7,025 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3700U vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3680.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700UXeon W3680
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+11%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.33 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
12 nm-63%
32 nm
Architecture
Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark
7,049
7,025
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,826
Geekbench 6 Single
794
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,115
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700UXeon W3680
Socket
FP5
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3700U) / not specified (Xeon W3680). The Ryzen 7 3700U includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 10), while the Xeon W3680 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3700U targets Mainstream Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700UXeon W3680
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon RX Vega 10
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop