Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
VS
Ryzen 7 3700U

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Ryzen 7 3700U

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is positioned at rank #168 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
3217%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
607%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
540%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
417%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
98%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
97%
#168
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
MSRP: $110|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 7 3700U leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 1300Ryzen 7 3700U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) / 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 3 PRO 1300Ryzen 7 3700U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Ryzen 7 3700U

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,106 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700U

The Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,049 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 3700U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700U — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700U (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 scores 7,106 against the Ryzen 7 3700U's 7,049 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3700U.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1300Ryzen 7 3700U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4 GHz+14%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+39%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
PassMark
7,106
7,049
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,826
Geekbench 6 Single
794
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,115
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1300Ryzen 7 3700U
Socket
AM4
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 1300) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3700U). The Ryzen 7 3700U includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 10), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3700U targets Mainstream Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1300Ryzen 7 3700U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon RX Vega 10
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop