Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Xeon E3-1241 v3

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1241 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Xeon E3-1241 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Xeon E3-1241 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Xeon E3-1241 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $163 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
  • Delivers 146.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 64.6 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1241 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (7,106 vs 7,169).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1241 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E3-1241 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 64.6 PassMark/$ ($273 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
  • 23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1241 v3 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1241 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1241 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1241 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E3-1241 v3 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1241 v3 comes in 148.2% more expensive on MSRP at $273 MSRP versus $110 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,106 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Xeon E3-1241 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,106 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E3-1241 v3

The Xeon E3-1241 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,169 points. Launch price was $273.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1241 v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1241 v3 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1241 v3 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1241 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 scores 7,106 against the Xeon E3-1241 v3's 7,169 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E3-1241 v3. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1300Xeon E3-1241 v3
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark
7,106
7,169
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1241 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1300Xeon E3-1241 v3
Socket
AM4
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was priced at $110, while the Xeon E3-1241 v3 came in at $273. On launch pricing ($110 vs $273), Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was $163 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 delivers 64.6 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1241 v3 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 the 84.4% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1300Xeon E3-1241 v3
MSRP
$110-60%
$273
Performance per Dollar
64.6+146%
26.3
Release Date
2017
2014

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.