Ryzen 7 4700U vs Xeon E5-2650 v4

Ryzen 7 4700U vs Xeon E5-2650 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 4700U

8 / 8

13,174

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2650 v4

12 / 24

13,290

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 4700U vs Xeon E5-2650 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 4700U vs Xeon E5-2650 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 4700U

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,174 vs 13,290).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650 v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2650 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,166 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 4700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2650 v4 better than Ryzen 7 4700U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2650 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 4700U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2650 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2650 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2650 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2650 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,166 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 4700U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 4700U vs Xeon E5-2650 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 4700U

The Ryzen 7 4700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,174 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2650 v4

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,290 points. Launch price was $1,166.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 4700U packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4700U versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — a 34.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 4700U (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 4700U uses the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 4700U scores 13,174 against the Xeon E5-2650 v4's 13,290 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4700U vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 4700U	Xeon E5-2650 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+41%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	13,174	13,290

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 4700U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 4700U	Xeon E5-2650 v4
Socket	FP6	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40