
Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Core 9 270H

Ryzen 7 7840HS

Core 9 270H
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 7840HS
Performance Per Dollar Core 9 270H
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840HS and Core 9 270H

Ryzen 7 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

Core 9 270H
The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7840HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core 9 270H offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core 9 270H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Core 9 270H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 28,538 against the Core 9 270H's 28,793 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 9 270H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,854 vs 16,500 (2.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 2,800, a 35.2% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 14,000 (16.2% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS vs 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 20+75% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.8 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+41% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,538 | 28,793 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,854+2% | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | 2,800+43% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,898 | 14,000+18% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 9 270H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and Mobile platform (Core 9 270H).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+167% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core 9 270H). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) (Core 9 270H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC, Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC | Extreme Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















