
Ryzen 7 7840HS vs EPYC 7303

Ryzen 7 7840HS

EPYC 7303
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 7840HS
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7303
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 7840HS | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 7840HS | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840HS and EPYC 7303

Ryzen 7 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7303
The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7840HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7303 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7303 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7303 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 28,538 against the EPYC 7303's 28,572 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7303. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,854 vs 18,000 (6.6% advantage for the EPYC 7303). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,960, a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 11,000 (7.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+50% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 28,538 | 28,572 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,854 | 18,000+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,898+8% | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7303 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7303 — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 204 GB — 22.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 8 (EPYC 7303). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 128 (EPYC 7303) — the EPYC 7303 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and SP3 platform (EPYC 7303).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+25% | 204 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V, SVM virtualization. The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the EPYC 7303 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC, EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H; EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC | High-frequency Server Workloads |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















