Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Xeon D-2795NT

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Xeon D-2795NT Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 7840HS

8 / 16

28,538

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Xeon D-2795NT

20 / 40

28,463

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Xeon D-2795NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Xeon D-2795NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +47.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 110W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon D-2795NT needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2795NT, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.

Xeon D-2795NT

2022

Why buy it

✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 16,854).
❌214.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Xeon D-2795NT?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-2795NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7840HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 47.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 12.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 7840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 47.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2579, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 20/40. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Xeon D-2795NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2795NT

The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 7840HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2795NT offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT — a 48.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS is built on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 28,538 against the Xeon D-2795NT's 28,463 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,854 vs 15,000 (11.6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,962, a 0% lead for the Xeon D-2795NT that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 11,898 (0% advantage for the Xeon D-2795NT). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS vs 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon D-2795NT
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+65%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+90%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	30 MB+88%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm-60%	10 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	—
PassMark	28,538	28,463
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,854+12%	15,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,898	11,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2795NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 155.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 4 (Xeon D-2795NT). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) — the Xeon D-2795NT offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT).

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon D-2795NT
Socket	FP8	FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+156%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1024 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	32+60%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT). The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon D-2795NT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC, Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon D-2795NT
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC	Networking / Edge Computing / SoC