EPYC 7303 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7303

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 7840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7303 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7303

16 / 32

28,572

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen 7 7840HS

8 / 16

28,538

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7303 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7303 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7303

2023

Why buy it

✅+6.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while EPYC 7303 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 18,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than EPYC 7303?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7303 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7840HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 7840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 37.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7303 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7303

The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7303 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7303 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7303 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303 scores 28,572 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7303. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 16,854 (6.6% advantage for the EPYC 7303). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,962, a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 11,898 (7.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS.

Feature	EPYC 7303	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	5.1 GHz+50%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+58%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	28,572	28,538
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,000+7%	16,854
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	11,898+8%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7303 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7303 versus LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 134.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 204 GB — 25.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7840HS). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — the EPYC 7303 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7303) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS).

Feature	EPYC 7303	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Socket	SP3	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+134%
Max RAM Capacity	204 GB	256 GB+25%
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	128+540%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V, SVM virtualization. The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the EPYC 7303 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334; Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

Feature	EPYC 7303	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	AMD-V, SVM
Target Use	High-frequency Server Workloads	High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC