EPYC 7303
VS
Xeon Gold 6148

EPYC 7303 vs Xeon Gold 6148

AMD

EPYC 7303

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6148

20 Cores40 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7303

#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
136%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
136%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
136%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
131%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
130%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
128%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
122%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
120%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
118%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
104%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
100%
#74
EPYC 7303
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6148

#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
111%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
111%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
110%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
108%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
108%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
107%
#489
EPYC 9654
MSRP: $11805|Avg: $5345
107%
#490
EPYC 7H12
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $1340
106%
#491
EPYC 7742
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $800
106%
#492
Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP: $4471|Avg: $4471
105%
#493
Xeon Platinum 8570
MSRP: $9595|Avg: $9595
103%
#494
EPYC 9184X
MSRP: $4928|Avg: $3750
102%
#495
Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP: $9359|Avg: $9359
102%
#496
Xeon E7-8857 v2
MSRP: $3838|Avg: $2995
100%
#497
Xeon Gold 6148
MSRP: $3072|Avg: $290
100%
#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
99%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
98%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
98%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
97%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
96%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
96%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
95%
#505
Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $500
94%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
90%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
89%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
88%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
88%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
88%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
87%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The EPYC 7303 (2023) utilizes 7 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7303Xeon Gold 6148
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($290)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Gold 6148 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7303Xeon Gold 6148
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($290)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7303 and Xeon Gold 6148

AMD

EPYC 7303

The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6148

The Xeon Gold 6148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,021 points. Launch price was $3,072.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7303 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6148 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6148 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6148 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6148 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7303 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6148 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303 scores 28,572 against the Xeon Gold 6148's 29,021 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6148. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 18,500 (2.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6148). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,254, a 43.9% lead for the EPYC 7303 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 9,445 (15.2% advantage for the EPYC 7303). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6148.

FeatureEPYC 7303Xeon Gold 6148
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
20 / 40+25%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+133%
27.5 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
20 MB+3900%
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
28,572
29,021+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,000
18,500+3%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,960+56%
1,254
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000+16%
9,445
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7303 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6148 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6148 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 204 GB 116% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6148). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6148) — the EPYC 7303 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7303) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6148).

FeatureEPYC 7303Xeon Gold 6148
Socket
SP3
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
204 GB
768 GB+276%
RAM Channels
8+33%
6
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+167%
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 7303 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6148 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7303) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6148). Primary use case: EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Xeon Gold 6148 targets Legacy Enterprise Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334; Xeon Gold 6148 rivals EPYC 7401.

FeatureEPYC 7303Xeon Gold 6148
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-frequency Server Workloads
Legacy Enterprise Workloads