EPYC 7303 vs Xeon D-2795NT

EPYC 7303 vs Xeon D-2795NT Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7303

16 / 32

28,572

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Xeon D-2795NT

20 / 40

28,463

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7303 vs Xeon D-2795NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7303 vs Xeon D-2795NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7303

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌18.2% higher power demand at 130W vs 110W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon D-2795NT

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 110W instead of 130W, a 20W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7303 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 18,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7303 better than Xeon D-2795NT?

Yes. EPYC 7303 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 20% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 0.4% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7303 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303 is the stronger fit. You are getting 20% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7303 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7303 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2795NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7303 vs Xeon D-2795NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7303

The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.

Xeon D-2795NT

The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7303 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon D-2795NT offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT — a 9.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 7303 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7303 is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7303 scores 28,572 against the Xeon D-2795NT's 28,463 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7303. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 15,000 (18.2% advantage for the EPYC 7303). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,962, a 0.1% lead for the Xeon D-2795NT that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 11,898 (7.8% advantage for the Xeon D-2795NT). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303 vs 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT.

Feature	EPYC 7303	Xeon D-2795NT
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	20 / 40+25%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+10%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+113%	30 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	—
PassMark	28,572	28,463
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,000+20%	15,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	11,898+8%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7303 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2795NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7303 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT — the EPYC 7303 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 204 GB — 402% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303) vs 4 (Xeon D-2795NT). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303) vs 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) — the EPYC 7303 offers 96 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7303) and SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT).

Feature	EPYC 7303	Xeon D-2795NT
Socket	SP3	FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+9%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	204 GB	1024 GB+402%
RAM Channels	8+100%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+300%	32

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 7303 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon D-2795NT supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7303) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT). Primary use case: EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334; Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302.

Feature	EPYC 7303	Xeon D-2795NT
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High-frequency Server Workloads	Networking / Edge Computing / SoC