Ryzen 7 7840HS
VS
Ryzen 7 260

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Ryzen 7 260

AMD

Ryzen 7 7840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 260

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 7840HS

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
106%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
101%
#66
Ryzen 7 7840HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 260

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
100%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
94%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
92%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
88%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Ryzen 7 7840HS shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightRyzen 7 7840HSRyzen 7 260
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 7 7840HSRyzen 7 260
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 7 260

AMD

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,339 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 7 260 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 260 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 260 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 28,538 against the Ryzen 7 260's 28,339 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 7 7840HSRyzen 7 260
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
28,538
28,339
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,854
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FP8 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.

FeatureRyzen 7 7840HSRyzen 7 260
Socket
FP8
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+300%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 260). Both include integrated graphics Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 260) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC, Ryzen 7 260 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

FeatureRyzen 7 7840HSRyzen 7 260
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
AMD-V
Target Use
High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC
Mobile