Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Xeon Gold 6138T
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs Xeon Gold 6138T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs Xeon Gold 6138T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs Xeon Gold 6138T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,433 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $2,742 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 781.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.5 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $2,742 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon Gold 6138T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,556 vs 11,988).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6138T, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6138T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+58.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+243.8% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 65.5 PassMark/$ ($2,742 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G better than Xeon Gold 6138T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs Xeon Gold 6138T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,227 points. Launch price was $299.
Xeon Gold 6138T
The Xeon Gold 6138T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,356 points. Launch price was $2,742.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138T offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138T — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G scores 20,227 against the Xeon Gold 6138T's 20,356 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6138T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,627 vs 1,030, a 44.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,556 vs 11,988 (45.4% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138T). L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138T.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 27.5 MB+244% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 20 MB+3900% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 20,227 | 20,356 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,814 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,627+58% | 1,030 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,556 | 11,988+59% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Gold 6138T — the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6138T supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6138T). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6138T) — the Xeon Gold 6138T offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM4 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6138T).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+20% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon Gold 6138T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) vs Yes (Xeon Gold 6138T). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon Gold 6138T requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 8 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G was priced at $309, while the Xeon Gold 6138T came in at $2742. On launch pricing ($309 vs $2742), Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G was $2433 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G delivers 65.5 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6138T — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G the 159.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309-89% | $2742 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.5+785% | 7.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G and Xeon Gold 6138T
