Ryzen 9 3900
VS
Xeon E7-4890 v2

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Xeon E7-4890 v2

AMD

Ryzen 9 3900

12 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900

#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
1049%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
316%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
250%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
219%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
125%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
124%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
113%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
113%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
111%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
108%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
107%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
106%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
105%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
103%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
101%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
100%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
99%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
99%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
95%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
93%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
92%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
92%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
90%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
90%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
89%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
89%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
87%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
87%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
86%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
86%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E7-4890 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
403%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
3%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
8%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
7%
#3
Xeon E7-4890 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
7%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
6%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
76%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
68%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
52%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
52%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 9 3900 (2019) utilizes 7 nm, 12 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 9 3900Xeon E7-4890 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 9 3900Xeon E7-4890 v2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 3900 and Xeon E7-4890 v2

AMD

Ryzen 9 3900

The Ryzen 9 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,588 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 3900 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 23.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3900 is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 3900 scores 30,588 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E7-4890 v2. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,700 vs 6,500 (92.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,713 vs 730, a 80.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,983 vs 5,500 (66.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.

FeatureRyzen 9 3900Xeon E7-4890 v2
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
15 / 30+25%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+26%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+11%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB+71%
37.5 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-68%
22 nm
Architecture
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
30,588
30,946+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,700+172%
6,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,713+135%
730
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,983+100%
5,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 3900 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900 versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the Ryzen 9 3900 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 3900) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 3900) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).

FeatureRyzen 9 3900Xeon E7-4890 v2
Socket
AM4
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
24
32+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 3900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900 targets Workstation Desktop (low power), Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 3900 rivals Core i9-9900; Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.

FeatureRyzen 9 3900Xeon E7-4890 v2
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation Desktop (low power)
Enterprise Server (Legacy)