Ryzen 9 3900
Xeon Gold 5220R
Ryzen 9 3900 vs Xeon Gold 5220R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 3900 vs Xeon Gold 5220R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 3900 vs Xeon Gold 5220R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅+29.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,281 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.3 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5220R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5220R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,327 vs 1,713).
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,372 vs 30,588).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 61.3 PassMark/$ ($1,780 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 3900 better than Xeon Gold 5220R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 3900 vs Xeon Gold 5220R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 9 3900
The Ryzen 9 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,588 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon Gold 5220R
The Xeon Gold 5220R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 30,372 points. Launch price was $1,555.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 3900 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5220R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5220R has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5220R — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3900 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 3900 scores 30,588 against the Xeon Gold 5220R's 30,372 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,713 vs 1,327, a 25.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5220R.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+79% | 35.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 24 MB+4700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,588 | 30,372 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,713+29% | 1,327 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,983 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 3900 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900 versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Gold 5220R — the Ryzen 9 3900 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5220R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 3900) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5220R). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 3900) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5220R) — the Xeon Gold 5220R offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900) and C620 (Xeon Gold 5220R).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+20% | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon Gold 5220R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900) vs Yes (Xeon Gold 5220R). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900 targets Workstation Desktop (low power). Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 3900 rivals Core i9-9900.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Workstation Desktop (low power) | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 9 3900 was priced at $499, while the Xeon Gold 5220R came in at $1780. On launch pricing ($499 vs $1780), Ryzen 9 3900 was $1281 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 3900 delivers 61.3 pts/$ vs 17.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5220R — making the Ryzen 9 3900 the 112.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-72% | $1780 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.3+258% | 17.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 3900 and Xeon Gold 5220R
