Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-10400F
Ryzen 9 3900X
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900X
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 3900X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($441) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 3900X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+73%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($441) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 3900X and Core i5-10400F
Ryzen 9 3900X
The Ryzen 9 3900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,517 points. Launch price was $499.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 3900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 9 3900X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900X versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3900X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 3900X scores 32,517 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 85.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,300 vs 1,454, a 11.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 5,783 (69.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900X). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900X vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+7% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+31% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+433% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 32,517+150% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | 1,454+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000+108% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 3900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 3900X) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Ryzen 9 3900X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550 (Ryzen 9 3900X) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 3900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900X targets Workstation, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 3900X launched at $499 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($441 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $339 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 3900X delivers 73.7 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 53.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $160-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $441 | $102-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.7 | 127.7+73% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 3900X and Core i5-10400F
