Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon W-1350

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon W-1350 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 4900HS

8 / 16

18,793

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1350

6 / 12

18,742

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon W-1350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon W-1350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 4900HS

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1350, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 20 PCIe lanes.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon W-1350.

Xeon W-1350

2021

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 20 PCIe lanes vs 8.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 4900HS.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,742 vs 18,793).
❌Launch MSRP is still $255 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 4900HS better than Xeon W-1350?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1350 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 4900HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 4900HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 4900HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 4900HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1350 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 9 4900HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $255 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-1350 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (73.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020), 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon W-1350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 4900HS

The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1350

The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 4900HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1350 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 9 4900HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-1350 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 4900HS scores 18,793 against the Xeon W-1350's 18,742 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 4900HS. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350.

Feature	Ryzen 9 4900HS	Xeon W-1350
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5 GHz+16%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	18,793	18,742
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,140
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,104

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1350 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-4266 on the Ryzen 9 4900HS versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-1350 — the Ryzen 9 4900HS supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-1350 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) vs 20 (Xeon W-1350) — the Xeon W-1350 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Ryzen 9 4900HS	Xeon W-1350
Socket	FP6	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-4266+33%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	20+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon W-1350 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS) vs Yes (Xeon W-1350). Both include integrated graphics — Vega 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) and UHD Graphics P750 (Xeon W-1350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End.