
Ryzen 9 8940HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 8940HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 350W, a 295W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (49,756 vs 51,161).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,399 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8940HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌536.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 8940HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 8940HX
2025Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 350W, a 295W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (49,756 vs 51,161).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,399 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8940HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌536.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 8940HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 8940HX better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 98 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 653 FPS | 782 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 361 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 231 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 848 FPS | 886 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 704 FPS |
| high | 600 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 514 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 542 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1071 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 966 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 843 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 759 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 840 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 746 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 651 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 564 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 8940HX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX


Ryzen 9 8940HX
Ryzen 9 8940HX
The Ryzen 9 8940HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,161 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 49,756 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 8940HX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 8940HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8940HX versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 8940HX uses the Dragon Range (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 8940HX scores 51,161 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX's 49,756 — a 2.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 8940HX. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+96% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range (2025) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 51,161+3% | 49,756 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 8940HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 8940HX versus 5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 64 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 5200+103900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+3276700% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). The Ryzen 9 8940HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX rivals Xeon w5-3435X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












