
Ryzen 9 8940HX

Xeon Gold 6418H
Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Xeon Gold 6418H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Xeon Gold 6418H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Xeon Gold 6418H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 8940HX
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 55W instead of 185W, a 130W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon Gold 6418H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (51,161 vs 51,711).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6418H, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6418H
2023Why buy it
- β +1.1% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- β 185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8940HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β236.4% higher power demand at 185W vs 55W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 8940HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 8940HX better than Xeon Gold 6418H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Xeon Gold 6418H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 9 8940HX
The Ryzen 9 8940HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,161 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6418H
The Xeon Gold 6418H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 51,711 points. Launch price was $2,065.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 8940HX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6418H offers 24 cores / 48 threads β the Xeon Gold 6418H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8940HX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6418H β a 28% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8940HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 8940HX uses the Dragon Range (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6418H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 8940HX scores 51,161 against the Xeon Gold 6418H's 51,711 β a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6418H. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 8940HX vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6418H.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+32% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+14% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+7% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 51,161 | 51,711+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,000 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 8940HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6418H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6418H supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6418H). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6418H) β the Xeon Gold 6418H offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6418H).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 4096 GB+6300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6418H). The Ryzen 9 8940HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon Gold 6418H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6418H rivals EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













