EPYC 7502 vs Ryzen 9 8940HX

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7502 vs Ryzen 9 8940HX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7502 vs Ryzen 9 8940HX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7502

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8940HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,600 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8940HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌227.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 8940HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 8940HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 8940HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 180W, a 125W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while EPYC 7502 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (51,161 vs 52,107).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7502, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 8940HX better than EPYC 7502?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7502 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 8940HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7502 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 8940HX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7502 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 9 8940HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,600 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7502 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.8% better PassMark. EPYC 7502 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 8940HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FL1 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7502 vs Ryzen 9 8940HX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7502

The EPYC 7502 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 52,107 points. Launch price was $2,600.

Ryzen 9 8940HX

The Ryzen 9 8940HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,161 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7502 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 9 8940HX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7502 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8940HX — a 45.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8940HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7502 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 8940HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7502 scores 52,107 against the Ryzen 9 8940HX's 51,161 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 7502. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 8940HX.

Feature	EPYC 7502	Ryzen 9 8940HX
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+100%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	5.3 GHz+58%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+100%	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Dragon Range (2025)
PassMark	52,107+2%	51,161
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7502 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 8940HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7502 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 8940HX — the Ryzen 9 8940HX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7502 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7502) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 8940HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7502) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) — the EPYC 7502 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7502) and AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 8940HX).

Feature	EPYC 7502	Ryzen 9 8940HX
Socket	TR4	FL1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-5200+63%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+6300%	64 GB
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7502) vs true (Ryzen 9 8940HX). The Ryzen 9 8940HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 7502 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7502 rivals Xeon Gold 6338.