EPYC 7502 vs Xeon w7-2475X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7502

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-2475X

20 Cores40 Thrd225 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon w7-2475X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7502

32 / 64

52,107

0.0%

Ryzen 9 7940H

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Xeon w7-2475X

20 / 40

53,211

+2.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon w7-2475X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon w7-2475X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7502

2019

Why buy it

✅+241.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 38 MB).
✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2475X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (52,107 vs 53,211).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 29.7 PassMark/$ ($2,600 MSRP vs $1,789 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2475X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-2475X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $811 less on MSRP ($1,789 MSRP vs $2,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 48.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.7 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($1,789 MSRP vs $2,600 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 128 MB).
❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-2475X better than EPYC 7502?

Yes. Xeon w7-2475X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-2475X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-2475X is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-2475X is the better buy right now. Xeon w7-2475X comes in $811 cheaper on MSRP at $1,789 MSRP versus $2,600 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 48.4% better value on MSRP (29.7 vs 20.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-2475X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon w7-2475X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7502

The EPYC 7502 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 52,107 points. Launch price was $2,600.

Xeon w7-2475X

The Xeon w7-2475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 53,211 points. Launch price was $1,789.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7502 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w7-2475X offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the EPYC 7502 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2475X — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2475X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7502 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon w7-2475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7502 scores 52,107 against the Xeon w7-2475X's 53,211 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon w7-2475X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon w7-2475X.

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon w7-2475X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+60%	20 / 40
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	4.8 GHz+43%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+241%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	52,107	53,211+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7502 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7502 versus 4800 on the Xeon w7-2475X — the Xeon w7-2475X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7502) vs 112 (Xeon w7-2475X) — the EPYC 7502 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7502) and W790 (Xeon w7-2475X).

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon w7-2475X
Socket	TR4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-2475X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7502 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon w7-2475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon w7-2475X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7502 was priced at $2600, while the Xeon w7-2475X came in at $1789. On launch pricing ($2600 vs $1789), Xeon w7-2475X was $811 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7502 delivers 20.0 pts/$ vs 29.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2475X — making the Xeon w7-2475X the 39% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon w7-2475X
MSRP	$2600	$1789-31%
Performance per Dollar	20.0	29.7+49%
Release Date	2019	2023

Search EPYC 7502 on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-2475X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.