
EPYC 7502

Xeon Gold 6418H
EPYC 7502 vs Xeon Gold 6418H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7502 vs Xeon Gold 6418H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7502 vs Xeon Gold 6418H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7502
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 185W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6418H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,600 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6418H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6418H moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6418H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (51,711 vs 52,107).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 128 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7502 better than Xeon Gold 6418H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7502 vs Xeon Gold 6418H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7502
The EPYC 7502 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 52,107 points. Launch price was $2,600.

Xeon Gold 6418H
The Xeon Gold 6418H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 51,711 points. Launch price was $2,065.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7502 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6418H offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7502 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6418H — a 17.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6418H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7502 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6418H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7502 scores 52,107 against the Xeon Gold 6418H's 51,711 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 7502. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502 vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6418H.
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 4 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+19% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+113% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 52,107 | 51,711 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7502 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6418H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7502 versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6418H — the Xeon Gold 6418H supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7502) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6418H) — the EPYC 7502 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7502) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6418H).
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7502 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon Gold 6418H rivals EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















