EPYC 7502 vs Xeon Gold 6348

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon Gold 6348 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7502

32 / 64

52,107

+0.5%

Ryzen 9 7940H

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Xeon Gold 6348

28 / 56

51,843

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon Gold 6348 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon Gold 6348: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7502

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+204.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 42 MB).
✅Costs $983 less on MSRP ($2,600 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($2,600 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 235W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6348 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Gold 6348

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (51,843 vs 52,107).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (42 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($3,583 MSRP vs $2,600 MSRP).
❌30.6% higher power demand at 235W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7502 better than Xeon Gold 6348?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6348 is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7502 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. EPYC 7502 also has the bigger cache pool with 204.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 42 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7502 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 204.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 42 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7502 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7502 comes in $983 cheaper on MSRP at $2,600 MSRP versus $3,583 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6348 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 38.5% better value on MSRP (20.0 vs 14.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6348 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon Gold 6348 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7502

The EPYC 7502 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 52,107 points. Launch price was $2,600.

Xeon Gold 6348

The Xeon Gold 6348 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 235 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 51,843 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7502 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6348 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7502 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6348 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6348 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7502 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7502 scores 52,107 against the Xeon Gold 6348's 51,843 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7502. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502 vs 42 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6348.

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon Gold 6348
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+14%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.5 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+205%	42 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	52,107	51,843

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7502 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7502) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6348) — the EPYC 7502 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7502) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6348).

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon Gold 6348
Socket	TR4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7502 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon Gold 6348 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon Gold 6348
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7502 was priced at $2600, while the Xeon Gold 6348 came in at $3583. On launch pricing ($2600 vs $3583), EPYC 7502 was $983 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7502 delivers 20.0 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6348 — making the EPYC 7502 the 32.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP	$2600-27%	$3583
Performance per Dollar	20.0+38%	14.5
Release Date	2019	2021

Search EPYC 7502 on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6348 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.