EPYC 7502
EPYC 9174F
EPYC 7502 vs EPYC 9174F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7502 vs EPYC 9174F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7502 vs EPYC 9174F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7502
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 320W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9174F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (52,107 vs 52,249).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 269.3 PassMark/$ ($2,600 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9174F moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9174F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,406 less on MSRP ($194 MSRP vs $2,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1243.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 269.3 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($194 MSRP vs $2,600 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌77.8% higher power demand at 320W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9174F better than EPYC 7502?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7502 vs EPYC 9174F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7502
The EPYC 7502 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 52,107 points. Launch price was $2,600.
EPYC 9174F
The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7502 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9174F offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7502 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502 versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F — a 27.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9174F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The EPYC 7502 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 9174F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7502 scores 52,107 against the EPYC 9174F's 52,249 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F.
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 4.4 GHz+31% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz+64% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 52,107 | 52,249 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7502 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9174F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7502 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9174F — the EPYC 9174F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7502) vs 12 (EPYC 9174F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7502) and SP5 (EPYC 9174F).
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7502 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7502 was priced at $2600, while the EPYC 9174F came in at $194. On launch pricing ($2600 vs $194), EPYC 9174F was $2406 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7502 delivers 20.0 pts/$ vs 269.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9174F — making the EPYC 9174F the 172.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2600 | $194-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.0 | 269.3+1247% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7502 and EPYC 9174F
