EPYC 7F72 vs EPYC 7502

EPYC 7F72 vs EPYC 7502 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7F72

24 / 48

52,840

+1.4%

Ryzen 9 8945HS

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

EPYC 7502

32 / 64

52,107

0.0%

Ryzen 9 7940H

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7F72 vs EPYC 7502 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7F72 vs EPYC 7502: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7F72

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $469 less on MSRP ($2,131 MSRP vs $2,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($2,131 MSRP vs $2,600 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌33.3% higher power demand at 240W vs 180W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 7502

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 180W instead of 240W, a 60W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7F72 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (52,107 vs 52,840).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 192 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($2,600 MSRP vs $2,131 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7F72 better than EPYC 7502?

Yes. EPYC 7F72 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7F72 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7F72 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7F72 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7F72 comes in $469 cheaper on MSRP at $2,131 MSRP versus $2,600 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 23.7% better value on MSRP (24.8 vs 20.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7F72 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019), 50% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 128 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7F72 vs EPYC 7502 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7F72

The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.

EPYC 7502

The EPYC 7502 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 52,107 points. Launch price was $2,600.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7F72 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 7502 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7502 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502 — a 9.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 7F72 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). Both are built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture using a 7 nm, 14 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7F72 scores 52,840 against the EPYC 7502's 52,107 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 7F72. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502.

Feature	EPYC 7F72	EPYC 7502
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+10%	3.35 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+28%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	192 MB (total)+50%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	52,840+1%	52,107

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7F72 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7502 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F72) and SP3 (EPYC 7502).

Feature	EPYC 7F72	EPYC 7502
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7502 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260; EPYC 7502 rivals Xeon Gold 6338.

Feature	EPYC 7F72	EPYC 7502
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7F72 was priced at $2131, while the EPYC 7502 came in at $2600. On launch pricing ($2131 vs $2600), EPYC 7F72 was $469 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F72 delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 20.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 7502 — making the EPYC 7F72 the 21.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7F72	EPYC 7502
MSRP	$2131-18%	$2600
Performance per Dollar	24.8+24%	20.0
Release Date	2020	2019

Search EPYC 7F72 on Amazon

Search EPYC 7502 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.